Taking Action to Reduce Oil Companies’ Climate Pollution
The U.S. Senate’s recent failure to pass a comprehensive climate and energy
bill was extremely disappointing. This setback highlights the
importance—and current necessity—of advancing climate policy at the
state and regional level.
On August 24, Washington Environmental
Council and the Cascade Chapter of the Sierra Club sent a 60-day notice
of their intent to file a lawsuit in federal court seeking regulation of
greenhouse gas emissions from BP’s Cherry Point oil refinery and four
other oil refineries in Washington State.
Together Washington
refineries account for an estimated 8% of the state’s global warming
pollution output, making the sector one of the largest single
contributors of greenhouse gas emissions in Washington.
Given
the lack of action on climate change at the federal level, the 60-day
notice calls on state regulators to move forward and curb global warming
pollution. This notice is a prerequisite to filing a citizens’ suit in
federal court under the Clean Air Act - it’s the first step on a long
road.
“What we have now is an opportunity to make significant
reductions in our state’s output of global warming pollution,” said Joan
Crooks, Executive Director of Washington Environmental Council. “The
law is clear – greenhouse gas emissions are polluting our air and right
now, they’re endangering our state’s economy and people, and they need
to be controlled.”
Refineries emit large quantities of global
warming pollution in the process of turning crude oil into products such
as gasoline, jet fuel, and asphalt. There are technologies and
management practices that would allow the oil refineries to decrease
their greenhouse gas emissions, but none of the refineries in the state
are currently required to implement these controls.
Although
the state has not regulated greenhouse gas emissions from the oil
refineries, recent rulings, such as the United States Supreme Court’s
decision in Massachusetts v. EPA, make it clear that greenhouse
emissions fall within the Clean Air Act’s definition of air pollutants
and are subject to regulation.
“The oil refineries pose a clear
threat to the health and welfare of Washington’s residents,” said Aaron
Robins of the Sierra Club. “These polluters need to clean up their act.
Right now Washington families are the ones getting stuck with the bill
as climate change devastates traditional Washington industries like
shellfish growing, reduces our snowpack and water supply, and harms our
forests and ecosystems.
The 60-day notice was sent to the
Department of Ecology, which is responsible for defining air pollution
standards, as well as the Northwest Clean Air Agency and Puget Sound
Clean Air Agency, which are responsible for implementing Clean Air Act
mandates on a regional level.
“Washington law requires oil
refineries in the state to use reasonably available methods for
controlling their greenhouse gas emissions,” explained Joshua
Osborne-Klein, an attorney with the law firm of Ziontz, Chestnut,
Varnell, Berley & Slonim, which represents the conservation groups.
“Unless our state regulators take serious steps to control greenhouse
gas emissions from the oil refineries, we’re going to ask the federal
courts to step in and ensure that this Washington’s air pollution laws
are fully implemented.”

